Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know why everyone in these threads is always obsessed with hit rate. It's totally irrelevant. It doesn't tell you anything.

If your success rate is 90%, you're probably applying for positions that pay less than you're worth. If you stretch your salary target, your hit rate will go down. 2% hit rate on $200k jobs is better than 90% hit rate on $40k jobs, end of discussion. Final salary relative to actual value is all that matters, and that's very hard to evaluate.



I’m living in a major metropolitan area on the east coast. The salary range locally for any level is at most $35K -$40K. That’s real money, but the interview process is not much different for the high end and the low end. It’s mostly based on skills and experience.


Unless you believe this is somehow affecting specific stages in the pipeline, I think it's a non-issue.


Of course it will affect specific stages more than others, but with these sample sizes variance within stages is already going to be large.


> Of course it will affect specific stages more than others

I don't think thats particularly obvious; if a weak candidate is applying above their weight, I would think a resume/recruiter screen is just as likely to screen them out as a tech screen.


I think that's naive, but it doesn't matter either way if there's a large variance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: