OP was comparing the two statements in terms of 'orthodox privilege'.
Meaning they were not claiming that they both have the same ethical standards or logical consistency. But rather that 'orthodox privilege' can be extrapolated into 'bubbles' or sub-cultures. The 'orthodox privilege' in PGs article is also mostly descriptive rather than normative.
You were arguing based on ethics and logic. I agree with your conclusion and I sympathize with your reaction. But it seems you missed what OP was going for: describing what people might think/say/do and why that might be rather than what they _should_ do.
Meaning they were not claiming that they both have the same ethical standards or logical consistency. But rather that 'orthodox privilege' can be extrapolated into 'bubbles' or sub-cultures. The 'orthodox privilege' in PGs article is also mostly descriptive rather than normative.
You were arguing based on ethics and logic. I agree with your conclusion and I sympathize with your reaction. But it seems you missed what OP was going for: describing what people might think/say/do and why that might be rather than what they _should_ do.