Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There should be a godwins law for people who attempt to use this method of ending a discussion.

"go read this book which explains my point because I can't explain it well enough to others." is not a convincing argument in the least.



What good are books if we can't direct people at them? That book makes my case. The fact that Bernays was a major advisor for the media complex of America makes the book an even more significant piece of evidence for my position.


The idea is not that books are not useful, but that you should make effort to summarize the main point of the book while still recommending the book.


Ok...the main point is that there is a shadow government that shapes our culture and people's perceptions through mass media and by corrupting influential people for the purpose of endorsing certain ideas/products. In that work, Bernays details these types of "shadow governments."


You should see their blog. It quotes Nietszche and the Bene Gesserit on the way to thousands of words restating Wittgenstein's axioms.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: