The point of the upstream post was that bcrypt implementations often already truncate your passwords to 72 characters.
If you switch to a different bcrypt implementation that does/does not truncate at 72 characters, the server-side truncation keeps all those 73 character passwords working.
If the server-side truncation were not in place, you'd get angry users.
If you switch to a different bcrypt implementation that does/does not truncate at 72 characters, the server-side truncation keeps all those 73 character passwords working.
If the server-side truncation were not in place, you'd get angry users.