Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Saying this as a Cloudflare investor, CF is in the wrong here and not spec compliant.


Choosing not to supply Client Subnet is entirely valid. Most services don't. But archive.is doesn't block those other services only Cloudflare. How "strange".


It's outside of my expertise. I just know that both sides have opinions and there's backers for both. Would be nice if there was an alternative to archive.is - outline?


archive.org gets my vote.


How is not supporting an optional extension "not spec compliant"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: