Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You should re-read what I said. No where do I see me saying physical force had to be used.

"Fixing" takes a long time that does not mean one should not deter attacks on the current system. How does one respond to a broken legacy software system that can be taken advantage of? You restrict the actions that can be performed on that system until it is replaced.



Yes I look internally to Mitigate the attack surface,I do not think about "reverse hacking" to "make them pay"

No the response from me, internally is, is how did they get in, how can I plug that hole, and how can I make my systems more robust.

Your response is making china (the hacker) pay, in order to "prevent" future attacks, that is simply naive IMO nor it is a viable solution.


deter - discourage (someone) from doing something by instilling doubt or fear of the consequences.

^ this is the deter I am talking about.

APT is on a different level than what you are used to. Also my question was rhetorical. Didn't actually mean for you to answer it. For you or your company it is not a viable solution since you don't have the resources.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: