Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You got me. Readers "should not have agency in their consumption of said streams." Clearly that was the point of my question posing the alternative. You nailed it.


What I nailed is the idea of back-pressure. Removing the consumer's ability to use back-pressure mechanisms against excessive stream provision is an anti-pattern.

Providers who want to maximize "engagement" do not care.

This is known as "spam".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: