Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "Here's a large number of studies saying X" is meaningless in a topic where a very large number of studies have been done. What you need is systematic reviews of the literature that not only count studies, but evaluate their quality and combine their results.

The sixth link in the article will get you what you want: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357421...



"The present review - of results published by my group from 2006 until 2016"

Self-evaluation of quality is not quite a systemic review of literature. Neither is research on drosophila melanogaster quite in the same ballpark as research on homo sapiens.


Thank you. The sheer volume of blatantly false comments on this thread is astounding to me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: