Yes, I agree with you.

For context, the original title was:

> “This is “how I tricked my co-workers” into using Racket.”

But has now been changed to:

> Taming OpenAPI using Racket to create a DSL

Which is the original sub-title of the article. The real title is actually:

> Making OpenAPI / Swagger Bearable With Your Own DSL

Yes, I don't see any mention of trickery in the article. For the record, capital-R Racketeers do not condone trickery.

That's a surprise! It sounds like the first in its line. As Wikipedia says:

> Scheme was originally called "Schemer", in the tradition of other Lisp-derived languages such as Planner or Conniver.

If there's any programming language family which condones trickery, I would think this would be it.

Whatever the goals of all the Scheming, it doesn't seem to have involved monetary wealth. :)

I interpret the "double "scare quotes"" in the title as suggesting cheeky sarcasm.

(In case future readers are confused, the original HN title had odd nested double-quotes, and the innermost quoted part was something like "how I tricked my employer into using Racket". Which seemed like terrible PR, giving the impression that this is something for irresponsible fringe fanatics.)