Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I guess the questions are whether:

1. copyright owners forced Google to implement DRM

2. Or, Google welcomed DRM (with the intention of lock-in)

3. Or, Google should have kept Chrome DRM free and fought the copyright owners...



I don’t think those questions matter at all. Regardless of how the current situation arose, it enables strong lock-in to Chrome vs. Chromium.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: