Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Chrome 9.0.587.0 dev: http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...

Chromium 10.0.605.0 (68575) with Crankshaft: http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...

Overall Crankshaft is 2.13x FASTER.

Ubuntu 10.04, old Core 2 Duo.



On my machine:

Chromium 10.0.604.0 (without Crankshaft): http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...

Firefox/4.0b8pre from 20101208: http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...

Overall, Firefox is 2.08x faster.

Ubuntu 10.10 x86_64, on a Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz

Comparing these with your results, it sounds like the JS performance war just got interesting again.


Huh, that's strange Firefox nightly here is slower than Crankshaft:

http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...


I did mention my Chrome test was without Crankshaft - I'm using x86_64, and Crankshaft isn't available for that platform yet.

Doing the comparison thing, apparently TraceMonkey is ~1.2x slower than Crankshaft on your machine. Things are hotting up indeed!


Chrome with Crankshaft (which is currently only for 32-bit architecture) is faster on Kraken than Firefox nightly.

http://www.arewefastyet.com/awfy2.php?machine=9




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: