This was the result of a prompt consisting of a single chicken leg emoji:
Offline
Activity: 1234
Merit: 1000
LegendaryActivity: 1234Merit: 1000 Re: BCH vs XCM - How to decide September 28, 2010, 02:17:45 PM #18 You don't know anything about BCH or XBC. Do you have something that you know that isn't what the majority of miners are thinking? I'm not aware of anything that you haven't heard about before in the Bitcoin world. I don't think some people think that it is more secure than any other alternative. Is there someone who knows more than you do about these currencies?
Quote The question of how we decide should also be debated. If we don't give a single vote on the block size limits, or the BCH and XBC proposals at least, there is no room for compromise. If I am a developer of an alt chain and someone gives me permission, I will work for it. If I am an alt chain developer and this user or group says "no" then I will support them. This allows developers to have different options if all the other devs, and even some developers who think it isn't worth working with the alt chain company, have some different opinions because there's a different way a transaction or code should be built that supports the idea of the alt chain.
Quote Can we stop saying this: "Bitcoin is secure"?
Well that's because in our vision, the future blockchain uses decentralized software, but the current software currently works for all purposes. So it's an experiment. At this point, it would be wise to get a better understanding of what you are trying to achieve. For example, if you want a more secure block chain, then how to achieve
Offline
Activity: 1234
Merit: 1000
LegendaryActivity: 1234Merit: 1000 Re: BCH vs XCM - How to decide September 28, 2010, 02:17:45 PM #18 You don't know anything about BCH or XBC. Do you have something that you know that isn't what the majority of miners are thinking? I'm not aware of anything that you haven't heard about before in the Bitcoin world. I don't think some people think that it is more secure than any other alternative. Is there someone who knows more than you do about these currencies?
Quote The question of how we decide should also be debated. If we don't give a single vote on the block size limits, or the BCH and XBC proposals at least, there is no room for compromise. If I am a developer of an alt chain and someone gives me permission, I will work for it. If I am an alt chain developer and this user or group says "no" then I will support them. This allows developers to have different options if all the other devs, and even some developers who think it isn't worth working with the alt chain company, have some different opinions because there's a different way a transaction or code should be built that supports the idea of the alt chain.
Quote Can we stop saying this: "Bitcoin is secure"?
Well that's because in our vision, the future blockchain uses decentralized software, but the current software currently works for all purposes. So it's an experiment. At this point, it would be wise to get a better understanding of what you are trying to achieve. For example, if you want a more secure block chain, then how to achieve