I've seen this line repeated over and over and over again, and honestly I don't see why this makes perfect sense to a bunch of people yet I haven't seen a good explanation of why you think that?
I want the state department to be able to do its job effectively. I saw extremely little in the cables (if anything) that changed my view of the state department, where is the scandal?
But the state department is now less effective than it was pre-Wikileaks.
Why, as an American, would I ever support that?
I agree if there is a scandal, leak that shit. Blow it up for all to see. But leaking by the original guy who had the clearance as an F U to the government, and now by Wikileaks as an F U to the united states doesn't seem necessary to me.
I want the state department to be able to do its job effectively. I saw extremely little in the cables (if anything) that changed my view of the state department, where is the scandal?
But the state department is now less effective than it was pre-Wikileaks.
Why, as an American, would I ever support that?
I agree if there is a scandal, leak that shit. Blow it up for all to see. But leaking by the original guy who had the clearance as an F U to the government, and now by Wikileaks as an F U to the united states doesn't seem necessary to me.