Do you think Apple and Stanford have a reason to falsify their results? Is it a sane, credible reason, based on actual history of those organizations falsifying medical research? Or, is it just an opposition related to malfunctioning tin-foil headgear? Is Stanford not a credible enough institution?
> Do you think Apple and Stanford have a reason to falsify their results?
Of course they do. It's just that if they did, there would likely be huge consequences for them, which makes one hope that they didn't do so in this case.
