Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> But it's still not sufficient for an IRA-style campaign

Sure, you wouldn't be as successful as the IRA, but it would still be a damn sight easier than attacking planes. Consider the hotel attacks in India for an example of how poorly defended most locations are.

> the IRA never set out to murder non-uniformed, uninvolved civilians

They bombed shops and factories that they considered to be part of the 'artificial'' economy of the British rulers. Non-uniformed, uninvolved civilians tend to work in shops and factories, hence the huge number of civilian injuries and casualties.

More stats:

Deaths by status of victim[2]

Status No.

Civilian 1855

Members of security forces (and reserves) 1123

of whom:

British Army (excluding Northern Ireland regiments) 502

Royal Ulster Constabulary 301

Ulster Defence Regiment 196

Northern Ireland Prison Service 24

Garda Síochána 9

Royal Irish Regiment 7

Territorial Army 7

English police forces 6

Royal Air Force 4

Royal Navy 2

Irish Army 1

Members of Republican Paramilitary Groups 394

Members of loyalist Paramilitary Groups 151

> .... property target of a collaborator ...

Whilst the Troubles was nominally a political conflict the lines were drawn across ethnic/religious grounds. Being a Protestant was sufficient to draw fire from PIRA (similary Catholics were persecuted by the loyalists).



And all I'm trying to draw a line between, is the way the shops were the target for the IRA as opposed to the civilians, themselves.

It's a lot easier to talk someone into leaving a bomb next to a boiler than to pick up an assault rifle and fire indiscriminately into a crowd of civilians.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: