It does indeed. It was mostly non-controversial, except for [AFAIK] one notable departure, de Espindola [1]. Lattner's response [2].
> ... new open source CoC whose mere existence is a violation of itself.
I can't tell if you're just being silly or if you're referring to an actual contradiction related to relicensing and/or the CoC.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/122922.htm...
[2] http://nondot.org/sabre/2018-05-02-Rafael.html
It does indeed. It was mostly non-controversial, except for [AFAIK] one notable departure, de Espindola [1]. Lattner's response [2].
> ... new open source CoC whose mere existence is a violation of itself.
I can't tell if you're just being silly or if you're referring to an actual contradiction related to relicensing and/or the CoC.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/122922.htm...
[2] http://nondot.org/sabre/2018-05-02-Rafael.html