It's nearly impossible to find. Google's paper put out by an intern right after that DRAM errors are way bigger than expected (yeah no shit if they're pulling this crap) dominates the results.

For a while I thought I was going crazy, but a comment from someone on this article implies he saw the same slide deck. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/10/dram-... I haven't been able to get anyone to reconfirm it from Google's end, my sense is that it's information that wasn't supposed to be released.