Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There are two reasons to use a blockchain: to avoid double spending in an adversarial environment, and to avoid central control of a database.

This application requires neither, and this implementation accomplishes neither.



I'm aware of the latter justification, but can you elaborate further how a blockchain is more effective at preventing double spending than a centralized system?


An adversarial environment kinda rules out control by one of the adversaries (ie, whoever is running the centralized system)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: