Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> My theory is that scanner manufacturers are deliberately choosing the JPG encoding profile that gets them the fastest result.

This is more-or-less correct. The chips in the printers have a lot less power than your CPU, and the algorithms are a lot worse than those in Photoshop.



I'm surprised there aren't any high-quality JPEG encoder ASICs.

Would scanners benefit from just using some of the plentiful, cheap, excellent-quality H.264 encoder ASICs—and treating the output as HEIF?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: