Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> In the end, it was less about "use Pony" and more about "do this in a way that matches with Wallaroo's architecture".

This could be accomplished without using Pony, unless you view "Wallaroo's architecture" as being effectively synonymous with "use Pony."



> This could be accomplished without using Pony

Sure, but why should it be accomplished without Pony? Languages are optimized for use-cases. This means that some languages are good and some are worse at handling particular use-cases. If Pony is the best choice for their use-case, why would you not choose it? Taking all the risks of a new tech into account, of course.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: