We already have laws on the books for vandalization and sabotage. We also have that horrific law that criminalizes EULAs and "Authorized Access". Why aren't they being used against these companies that make easy to remote-pwn gear? Its readily evident that it's not the end-user's actions that cause these forms of vandalization and digital assault.
Id much prefer enforcing laws, rather than make new ones we hardware creators have to parse and understand.
(Like, how does this affect open source hardware? Some of my side projects are put online. I know a few implementations in the wild already.)
We already have laws on the books for vandalization and sabotage. We also have that horrific law that criminalizes EULAs and "Authorized Access". Why aren't they being used against these companies that make easy to remote-pwn gear? Its readily evident that it's not the end-user's actions that cause these forms of vandalization and digital assault.
Id much prefer enforcing laws, rather than make new ones we hardware creators have to parse and understand.
(Like, how does this affect open source hardware? Some of my side projects are put online. I know a few implementations in the wild already.)