Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Pro-business" has apparently come to mean that any desire of a company, especially a large company, should be granted. That watch has a company logo? Pay up.


Just to be perfectly clear (not that you made this mistake, but because I see so many others doing so when this topic comes up):

The terms "pro-business" and "free market" are often taken as synonymous, when nothing could be further from the truth. A real capitalist market is not "pro-business" any more than it is "pro-consumer": it provides a level playing field in which all comers can interact based on their own merits and needs.

The "pro-business" policies that we see so much of are not examples of evil capitalism. They are just as anti-capitalist as is socialism. These policies are more correctly called "corporatism".

Please do not view the economic evils we see today, and use that to tar the ideas of capitalism.


how does costco fit into your model?


Could you expand on this point? I don't see the relationship between the parent's assertion and Costco (even after reading the wikipedia article on Costco).


He means that costco is a business too.

But their desires are not being granted.

Meaning that his "pro-business" argument is wrong, since it's pro one business and against a different one. So his entire premise is false.


Well another issue is that costco is a wholesale company. Anything that is anti-costco is also opposing the untold thousands of small businesses that use costco to get cheap supplies and increase profits.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: