Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The approach we take is to track a lot, and figure out what works the best over time.

That's really, really bad statistics.



Why? Sure you will get some things that might initially end up looking significant but aren't, but it's not that hard to retest those things from scratch to minimize that.

In general if you're going to provide a critical comment I think it would be better for the community here to expound on it a bit so everyone can understand your argument.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: