Even a shareholder would care about impact to revenues more than his ability to get an iphone from a neighboring state
But nice try, turns out you can also own shares of foreign corporations that do no business anywhere near you, so there goes the basis for that argument
I do not see how stopping the sale of iPhones in Nebraska would help Apple solve the potential loss of revenue from the new competition in the repairs market.
The main thing it would do is reduce sales revenue. I think every shareholder (based in Nebraska or otherwise) would be concerned about that.
But nice try, turns out you can also own shares of foreign corporations that do no business anywhere near you, so there goes the basis for that argument