To some extent I'm sure that's true, but I'm guessing that this report relies less on that, and more on mindless calculations of "could this be improved/built up/repaired?" while failing to step back and realize we're chasing an impossible end. It's what happens when people apply their codes and manuals, thinking that those things are purely factual, as if such a thing could ever be free of value judgments that need to be periodically reevaluated (in this case, the values are probably vehicle speed and throughout.)