Simply being expensive doesn't make my point "totally wrong". It's not expensive, anyway: the cost is shared between all who buy the recording, or attend the concert.
Early Medieval music can't be reproduced at any cost, with the few exceptions we have requiring years of study before they were understood.
Also, I think people would have heard lots of music. Pubs in Britain used to have pianos, Irish pubs are known for having musicians, folk dancing was common, etc.
>Also, I think people would have heard lots of music. Pubs in Britain used to have pianos, Irish pubs are known for having musicians, folk dancing was common, etc.
How often did these pub-goers hear Brahms or Vivaldi? Probably never. They heard whatever music that local musicians played, or whatever they figured out how to play as amateurs, and that was about it. They didn't have companies finding talented musicians in different regions, countries, or continents and marketing them, recording their music, and making it available for them to buy a copy so they could listen to it while driving to work.
Early Medieval music can't be reproduced at any cost, with the few exceptions we have requiring years of study before they were understood.
Also, I think people would have heard lots of music. Pubs in Britain used to have pianos, Irish pubs are known for having musicians, folk dancing was common, etc.