Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"there was no actual damage to the plane and there's indeed some speculation that it may have even been a plastic bag or something."

This is an amazingly flimsy basis for a headline.



No flimsier than the original drone-claim headline.

Contrary to popular conception, most airline pilots are very poor at recognising anything that isn't in their company fleet. A few are aircraft enthusiasts, a few are bird spotters. The remainder have knowledge of unexpected flying objects no better than most laymen and a lot worse than a school-age plane spotter.

I used to run aircraft recognition training for a local cadet squadron. The 'pro-pilots' were uniformly awful.


Aren't they trained to judge size and distance by eye, though?


This is a moral panic! Flimsy is rock-solid compared to satanic abuse rings and penis thieves.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: