Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The line between trader and quant in electronic trading scenarios is pretty vague and has been for some time.


That's plausible, my indirect experience is not current.


One gets you fired when you lose money and the other gets you a speaking opportunities at universities where kids are discovering Gordon Gekko.


You want it to be that way, but it's the other way.

If you're just a "cog in the machine" doing research or writing software for a trader, and he ends up sucking, the firm will probably shuffle you around to work under someone else. You have generally useful technical skills, cost less than the trader, and recruiting good technical people is expensive.

If you're a supposedly brilliant trader but cost the firm money taking stupid risk or fail to make any profit to justify your inflated salary and bonus, there's not really much they can do with you.


.... like john merriweather or victor niederhoffer for instance. two guys who've blown up the world multiple times but still manage to find capital and manage huge funds.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: