Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well remove the protection government employees have, sovereign immunity protects both negligent government employees as well the entire bureaucratic structure. In other words, if a privately managed water system is found deficient or worse individuals are found knowingly negligent they can be held liable criminally. When it comes to the public sector this is not true, you cannot sue the people or government organization involved. You can only make a claim against their insurance if that is allowed and they can decide if it is.

If we are going to continue to have important services be run by government we must life the sovereign immunity they enjoy. This will raise the accountability so they act in our best interest.



> In other words, if a privately managed water system is found deficient or worse individuals are found knowingly negligent they can be held liable criminally

That certainly worked well with the banking industry.


Let's not forget that banking is a government-protected industry. A big recourse that a lot of people have in the normal, private space is to switch to a competitor. This naturally leads to competitors that try out things that are different to things you don't like. That mechanism is simply not present in the banking industry precisely because it's controlled (regulated/restricted entry) by government.


That was acutely tied up in consequences for politicians and regulators - and as Flint is showing the one thing political turkeys don't vote for is Christmas jailtime for themselves. The Federal Government actively encouraged the mortgage crash through encouraging uneconomical home ownership and destroying banking regulation.

"Big water" is not the banking industry, the disparity between regulator and regulated is much less likely to occur and the opportunities for mega profits with which to bribe politicians, and allow them to bribe us with the resultant tax take, simply aren't there.


But what if cities simply increased spending to defend against this increased quantity of lawsuits?

Wouldn't more money be diverted _away from_ important areas like water system infrastructure and _toward_ lawyers and legal defense teams?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: