There are multiple police reports from each of the calls to him. Conspiricy theorists will just claim the reports have been doctored or whatever, but in reality the police wouldn't of known who it was before responding to the call, and probably still didn't know who it was after responding to the call. What is clear is Ian, very dunk at the time, did resist arrest and assaulted the officers (per the report).
Each time he was treated by a medical professional and deemed OK to be released. He didn't go to the hospital like advised, instead seemingly opting to continue drinking and running about in public at 2:40 AM banging on people's front doors.
There are many cases of real police brutality - this is not one.
The reports don't have to have been "doctored", they can very well have not been true to begin with.
Not sure why this would require them to have any idea who Murdock was. This isn't necessarily related to him being the inventor of Debian. Maybe he was just talking back to the cops and they exaggerated it to "resisting arrest" in the report.
I mean, the reports may well be true and Murdock may well have been suffering from some mental issues (the Twitter posts seem to bear this out). But it's nuts to think we can just trust the police and that if they say something wasn't police brutality then that's the end of the story.
Watching the news in the US from the UK, it's pretty clear that you (in the states) long ago reached the point where it's not even paranoia any more. The police there killed more civilians in a few weeks of the year than the UK police have killed here in hundreds of years. They murder and lie about it; it's going to be interesting to see what happens now that it's routinely caught on camera, but to suggest that there's anything tin-foil-hat crazy about suggesting that the police might have done something wrong here which has resulted in someone's death betrays a naive (at best) comprehension of the situation there today.
OK well I suppose then it is fair to say that on average 150 police a year die in the line of duty from criminal action, yet in the UK, here is a list of all that have died since 1900: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_police_officer... The police in the US face many more people with guns, so comparing it with the UK is absurd. I have lived in the UK it is a lot different there in regards to violent crime, and gun crime is basically unheard of.
To put this in perspective there are more deaths per year in the NYPD than all of UK, Iceland, Japan and other countries that are used to make non equivalent comparisons.
The police do indeed do wrong things sometimes, but to imply that the higher rate of citizen killings here is due to some police malfeasance or conspiracy is indeed tinfoil hat.
You can't explain away the massive discrepancy between the UK and the US simply by saying it's because the police face more people with guns, I'm afraid, although clearly the ridiculous US gun laws are implicated. There's simply no willingness to take the generally speaking white-cop-on-black-guy murder seriously; it doesn't require a conspiracy to explain it; the transition from slavery to lynching to today just hasn't been handled very well and therefore it's essentially still happening in slow motion. Sort that out and you'll address much of the problem. The other side of the coin is the whole US military industrial thing; the massive profits in being a provider to the military for their little ongoing adventures in muslim countries, and the sideline in providing much of the kit to police forces. This will only get worse as the divide between rich and poor continues to grow. There's no need for conspiracy theories to explain what's happening; no need to look for secret meetings; this is all out in the open and has been for decades.
Well, the US has far more citizens killing other citizens than than the UK, that should be kept in mind if you are on the verge of calling the police basically murderers. It's convenient that you don't consider how often police are murdered by citizens either.
I don't think it's naive not to be a conspiracy theorist. Sure, there are some cases of police murders and other misconduct but it's hardly the norm and it is rather spurious to think every run-in with the police lurks the head of a grand conspiracy or a cover-up.
When you watch the news in the US from the UK, keep in mind that many have a vested interest in telling a certain narrative.
The police ask to be police; I don't care about occupational hazards; I'm more concerned with people going to work and not coming back home because of a cops paranoia or attitude problem. And it's not interesting to me to determine which percentage of cops are guilty of misconduct; the problem is that the system as a whole is was not designed to protect justice or the citizens of the US but the people who run it and the people it was set up to protect (the wealthy) so you'd not expect it to do a very good job of protecting poor black people. Whether 1% or 60% of cops overstep the mark, murder, frame, torture etc? Not really a very interesting statistic.
The various news sources in the UK have no reason to attack the US police; i'm not sure where you get that from; perhaps it's something you say when someone receives information you don't agree with or find damaging to your beliefs. Statistics; simply the number of dead; don't really lend themselves to much to "narratives".
What paranoia? The police pulls shit like that all the time and calls it "assaulting an officer" is you dare say anything back. Including to 12 and 15 year old unarmed kids.
While we might have reasons to think otherwise for this particular case, the paranoia is very much guaranteed in the general case.
Have we really reached this level of paranoia?
There are multiple police reports from each of the calls to him. Conspiricy theorists will just claim the reports have been doctored or whatever, but in reality the police wouldn't of known who it was before responding to the call, and probably still didn't know who it was after responding to the call. What is clear is Ian, very dunk at the time, did resist arrest and assaulted the officers (per the report).
Each time he was treated by a medical professional and deemed OK to be released. He didn't go to the hospital like advised, instead seemingly opting to continue drinking and running about in public at 2:40 AM banging on people's front doors.
There are many cases of real police brutality - this is not one.