With 10% unemployment, and the last eight years consisting of a non-stop stagnation / recession (Finland has had zero net GDP growth since 2007) - how would removing workers from the labor pool not crash the economy even further?
Finland is very likely to see its GDP stay at 2007 levels for at least a 15 to 20 year period of time. There's nothing indicating growth or recovery is inbound (things have only been getting worse the last three years). I don't see how it can all be paid for with a broken economy.
Unless the premise is to drop concern for total economic output, and strictly focus on redistribution to raise the median. That seems like a huge leap of faith, unless you can get tax revenues to climb with greater economic growth.
Finland is very likely to see its GDP stay at 2007 levels for at least a 15 to 20 year period of time. There's nothing indicating growth or recovery is inbound (things have only been getting worse the last three years). I don't see how it can all be paid for with a broken economy.
Unless the premise is to drop concern for total economic output, and strictly focus on redistribution to raise the median. That seems like a huge leap of faith, unless you can get tax revenues to climb with greater economic growth.