Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | whateveracct's commentslogin

Trump was talking about the protests there and that the US would help them. And we kept killing Iranian leadership lol.

Why are you taking what the Trump admin says at face value, anyways? Are you still a fool after all these years? This is like "fool me a 10,000th time" by now haaha


What he says matches to reality: that regime change isn't possible with an air war. Thus even if you don't listen to him, we know from prior experience that regime change is highly improbable. Every person educated about these things knows that.

The contemplated (and moved!) ground troops for weeks lol.

stupid is as stupid does

way too hard

stackful coroutines are not hard to implement


Go's syntax is basically C tho lol

what's the benefit? for loops?


I have been able to build plenty of stuff with a pretty plain emacs + ghci for years...neither are black boxes. Except maybe my brain driving them.

They run on an operating system you probably don't know all the inner workings of.

And that runs on a chip with trillions of transistors.


Yeah so? Claude isn't an OS. It's the thing making my code. I don't want my codebase to be some bytecode adjacent thing that LLMs operate on.

So you stand upon a big pile of black boxes.

Black boxes aren't inherently bad. But if they don't have well defined mappings of inputs to outputs, they aren't good black boxes. That's the problem with Claude Code imo.

try one shotting something actually original and see how it goes

i keep getting nonsense


> That doesn't sound like much of an issue. Bob was already going to encounter problems that are too large and complex for him to solve, agents or otherwise.

I have literally never run into this in my career..challenges have always been something to help me grow.


Go pay for the API. It's not complicated.

Does this matter if my account is some random username about birds?

Like all people learn is "someone does in fact live at that address and they use this app"


Maybe not, but I'd want to know beforehand either way. And looking through accounts near me suggests that a fair number of users add enough detail to make me think that they don't realize that their info is so public (selfies/profile pictures being the most problematic example imo).

Depends on what linking credentials you may have registered with. If they have a data leak, those details will be linked to your address in that way.

Seems pretty unlikely even with a data leak, that someone would go through the effort, but it's worth acknowledging as a vector.


Yah, this is what I do, however I think this is what GP is talking about when they say savvy (or maybe I'm flattering myself). Plenty of folks with their full details on their profile.

Home ownership is in the public record tho, right?

Right, this is true, so it is possible to associate a person to their photos.

My main concern was revealing my home address, however, and I don't believe my actions on iNaturalist allow folks to go from my name to my address.


That's because abstraction is compression of information.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: