> [hypertension notifications] is not intended for use by people [...] who have been previously diagnosed with hypertension

Sounds a bit ironic but I guess it's for legal reasons.

legal, and also: if you already have been diagnosed, you should already be under medical professional supervision (meds, checkups,…) anyway.

my guess is this is more like the heart irregularities feature: it’s for the first diagnosis. (a relative of mine actually got diagnosed that way)

I believe this is for the fringe cases where you have been diagnosed with hypertension, but your apple Watch does not tell you that you have hypertension risk, then you may decide to not take your drugs, since your watch told you all clear. This could trigger lawsuits if complications set in when you decide not to take your drugs because of "lack of alarm"

Then you get a new fringe case: you are not yet diagnosed with hypertension, but you are aware that your apple watch has that functionality so you decide you don't need to be diagnosed.

It's the same for the Afib detection.

The point of the detection features are to notify people who are not diagnosed with the condition to go to the doctor about it possibly get diagnosed with it.

It's not useful for people already diagnosed because they already know they have it, so the notification is just telling them something they already know.

how quickly does magnesium work, and how quickly does it get worse if you don't take it?

About a week both to start working and weening off

Isn't Yuzu a good counter example?

Yuzu’s downfall was not the repo, it was their Discord. They were sharing DRM cracking keys on there and getting paid $30K/month on Patreon. It’s the same reason most emulators require you to bring your own BIOS.

It does not sound relevant to me, because that was a case of "video game piracy". It was not about the name per se.

Are there any prompts/tests about recalling multiple needles (spread out) at once?

For example, each needle could be a piece to a logic puzzle.

In other words, a lot of fuss about nothing.

Well it's a big deal to me. OpenAI have not conducted themselves in a way that makes me want to share my search intents with them, and I don't care if they or DDG tell me that what I tell them "won't be used to train AI models".

Well, since it affects inference speed it means you can handle more in less time, needing less concurrency.

Seems fixed now

Which non-coding benchmark?

> Why do they not focus on hosting other open models then?

They do host other open models as well (pay-per-token).