Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rohfle's commentslogin

  - born 1919
  - upper middle class life in boston
  - started illustrating 1949
  - started writing original works 1955
  - moved to switzerland 1972
  - died 1994
He wasnt alone in his world view at the time. Think about how much the world has changed since.


Someone on youtube was working on a raw 35mm scan of this earlier in the year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=octCLWQqf1A




I opened an issue for this thanks to your suggestion: https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all/issues/11

Edit: talked to someone on discord, they're aware of it and working on moving the hosting


From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israeli_judicial_reform_p...

> [The 2023 Israeli judicial reform] seeks to curb the judiciary's influence over lawmaking and public policy by limiting the Supreme Court's power to exercise judicial review, granting the government control over judicial appointments and limiting the authority of its legal advisors. If adopted, the reform would grant the Knesset the power to override Supreme Court rulings that deem legislation passed by the Knesset as unconstitutional, by reintroducing the legislation and approving it with a majority of Knesset Members.


From https://github.com/bigscience-workshop/petals/wiki/Security,...

> Q: Does Petals guarantee that model outputs are correct?

> Not by default. A faulty or malicious server could give you incorrect outputs. There are two things you can do about this:

> - Verify outputs. Send some of your tensors to two or more peers and check that the answers match.

> - Set up a private swarm. You can launch your own swarm hosted by people and organization you trust, who are authorized to process your data.

> In future, we plan to implement an automatic verification and a reputation system, so that clients can select servers that they can trust.


Byzantine problems allover again..


Possibly related in a fun unrealistic way: https://store.steampowered.com/app/762610/Russian_Subway_Dog...


A couple of notes

  - If I tag a docker image with multiple tags, and then push it to Gitlab, each tag counts towards the storage limits even though SHAs are identical. eg 100MB container tagged with "latest" and "v0.5" uses 200MB of storage.
  - The storage limit is not per repository, but per namespace. So 5GB free combined for all repositories under your user. If you create a group, then you get 5GB free combined for that group. Does this include forks? Does this include compression server side?
  - The 10GB egress limit per month includes egress to self-hosted Gitlab Runners in free tier. Consider this with the 400 minutes per month limit on shared runners.
These limits feel less like curbing abuse and more like squeezing to see who will jump to premium while reducing operating costs. Is this a consequence to Gitlab hosting on GCP with associated egress and storage costs? Is this a move to improve financials / justify a market cap with fiscal storm clouds on the horizon? Is this being incentivized by $67m in awarded stock between the CFO and 2 directors?

Stock history over last year for GTLB (since IPO in 2021?): https://yhoo.it/3QaExCs

From the golden era of 2015: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2015/04/08/gitlab-dot-com-stor...

> To celebrate today's good news we've permanently raised our storage limit per repository on GitLab.com from 5GB to 10GB. As before, public and private repositories on GitLab.com are unlimited, don't have a transfer limit and they include unlimited collaborators.


Hi @rohfle! A couple of clarifications:

> If I tag a docker image with multiple tags, and then push it to Gitlab, each tag counts towards the storage limits even though SHAs are identical. eg 100MB container tagged with "latest" and "v0.5" uses 200MB of storage.

Any "duplicated" data under a given "node" (be that the root namespace, a group or a project) counts towards the storage usage only once. So images latest and v0.5 would only represent 100MB in their namespace registry usage, not 200MB.

> Does this include forks?

The registry data is not copied/duplicated when one forks a project. So this is not applicable. But even if it was, as long as the fork and the source are under the same root namespace, any "duplicated" registry data across the two would only count towards the storage usage once.

> Does this include compression server side?

Yes, the measured size is the size of the compressed artifacts on the storage backend.

We should be updating the docs shortly to make these answers more transparent!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: