Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | netule's commentslogin

But they both used C++, a rare and obscure language rarely used in cryptography! /s

This post really resonated with me. Through the daily drudgery, I lost that spark that drove me to programming in the first place as a kid and became disgruntled with it for a while. It wasn't until I pushed myself to get back to hobby (or shed) programming that I rekindled my old passion and, as a result, find my day job much more bearable.

Opposite for me.

I have an actual shed that I spend time in, doing maintenance work, building physical items (latest one is an auto-refilling bird watering station), and making beer. Given my day job is so desk-bound, and so tech oriented, I find using my hands in my off-time to be very fulfilling and what keeps me sane.

Different strokes, as they say.


I had to get out of tech for that reason: i need a physical good I can create and hold. Using my engineer skills to build physical things satiates my brain so much more. I don't think I can ever go back to coding as a job. I just don't care about other people's garbage code, lol.

i got out of tech/coding so i could apply my skills to more real world stuff. it's been so much better. i don't make as much but i end each day with a feeling of satisfaction and accomplishment. i wouldn't trade it away. my social life has gotten so much better, as well, because i'm happier in general and i talk to so many more people as a result. i smile more, i think is the main thing.


And what are you doing now? :-)

How’d you get out? For the many over-specialized readers like myself…

Surely step one is psychological. I feel like being able to accept a lower paycheck is critical to leaving tech if you’re at the over specialized part of your career

That is not merely psychological unless you're very early in your career and life, with no dependents, etc.

Technically, leaving your family to live as a hermit is also a psychological decision.

That's financial and circumstantial, not (just) psychological.

Psychological in the sense that my kids will need to psychologically accept that they now live under a bridge?

Callous, but that’s your fault for building a life that requires tech money to maintain. I don’t get the point of comments like yours, just to make one feel bad for escaping the golden handcuffs.

There are plenty of people that have children and live decent lives earning less than $200k/year + benefits.


I'm making under 200k now. If I got out of software I'm pretty sure it would still go down.

Sorry for making you feel bad.


Congratulations and thanks for sharing.

Same here. I've been trying to get more into the physical world, with a tech angle, rather than just pure software. As you said, using my hands is what keeps me sane, makes the world seem a little more real, if that makes sense?

Copilot Copilot for Copilot

Someone can probably make a valid "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" out of Copilot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal...


You're talking about the aladeen or that aladeen? I don't understand which aladeen you are talking about.

You could try Copilot Copilot for Windows with Windows Copilot. I know it's still got Copilot in it, but not as much as Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot MS Office for Windows Copilot.

But I don't like Copilot!

Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot

I guess it does sort of work as a "grammatical infinity" idea https://medium.com/luminasticity/cardinality-and-growth-rate...

Like an imperative, because copilot can exist as a verb, I copilot a plane, and Copilot can exist as a software product, and as a helper in a software product that is itself a software product that helps you use the software product it is a helper to

So Copilot copilot! could be an imperative for Copilot to Copilot, and Copilot Copilot could be a description of a software product that helps people use a software product named Copilot, but the second is not really grammatically correct as a sentence, whereas the imperative is.

So in the end I guess you could have a Copilot Copilot..[infinite Copilots]..copilot!


Copilot copilots Copilot copilots copilot copilot Copilot copilots

Woah that actually works...

Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots, which other Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots assist, themselves assist Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots.


I just woke up, please for the love of ai slop, stop before you break my definition of the word copilot!

(Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..)


After reading this thread, my brain is now convinced that copilots are actually some sort of small South American mammals.

I think I'll stick to that definition; I don't want to lose my mental image of the daft-looking little copilots roaming around the Inter-Andean valleys that their more menacing-looking ancestors once inhabited. Yeah, cute little things.


> (Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..)

Too late. Microsoft already caused that to happen.


Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

I'm currently dealing with a similar issue! I can't see issues in my own repos, and Copilot (which I pay for annually) has completely stopped working. This just happened overnight, and I have no idea what could have caused this situation.

> They lost me at putting "overreacting" in the title.

I think you just proved their point for them.


Soooo many comments here cite the "overreacting" point and then go on to prove it.


I donate to Wikipedia on a recurring, monthly basis and don’t get any of this.


Of course, recurring payments work completely differently. A shockingly large fraction of recurring payments are from people who never got around to cancelling it. They're already getting what they want, any email just risks disturbing this situation.


I still get yearly email summary of my donations. They don't need to send more, and they could not send it if their objective is to stay under the radar


That could be true. I guess I could try giving a one-time donation from another account and see what happens.


Mom’s listening along on the other phone with her hand covering the receiver.


They reflect the traits that OP values in others; these criteria wouldn't be universal. I think the thought experiment still holds: If I met myself on the street, would I like that person? If not, why not, and how can I fix that?


I’ve paid for a few licenses so far just to support the guy making it. It’s a crucial tool in my gamedev workflow, and really couldn’t do without.


Something like this could definitely replace my crufty Obsidian + scripts workflow if it ran on Linux.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: