They are not connected afaik.

Why do you believe open source means free to use and distribute commercially?

Are you joking or just new? This is a foundational, bedrock principal of open source.

https://opensource.org/faq#commercial

Because that’s literally the definition of open source:

> Open-source software is software released under a license where the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code, for any purpose.

That’s the first result you get on Google—and it’s exactly why so many companies relicensed their projects (Redis, HashiCorp, Elasticsearch, MongoDB…).

If it’s open source, you can sell it, host it, or give it away for free. The only difference is which obligations the license attaches:

GPL → you must keep the license.

AGPL → you must keep it and extend it to hosted services.

BSD/MIT → do almost whatever you want.

But the core right is always the same: distribute, host, and sell. Courts have even confirmed this is the accepted definition of “open source.”

Getting errors in console, won't start.

hook.js:608 Failed to parse JSON from match: SyntaxError: Expected ',' or ']' after array element in JSON at position 207 (line 3 column 194) at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at build-studio-C28lcD4m.js:67:471

Stuck at "Starting project..."

Also, seems like 15-20 people to build this, after just a couple of months. Something is off with the numbers. Also, vibe coding platforms are becoming commodity with other platforms lightyears ahead, approaching zero margins.

Definitely wish you luck, but something feels off with the numbers, timeline, product and the market you chose :)

Im Norwegian and have used it several times in the US.

How did you do it, is the app downloadable in the norwegian App Store?

In the Netherlands store the Waymo One app is not available, I thought it would be the same for other countries but apparently I was wrong.

You can derive naviger stokes from newtons laws, or I suppose some conversation laws.

Wasn't sure so I checked. Not a physicist.

If navier-stokes equations can be derived from Newton's laws, then Newton's laws can be derived from Galileo, Archimedes before him, even some older thinkers before them.

Newton ignored viscosity, and density. He made some discoveries on fluid dynamics but his famous laws only apply to solid objects. Same for velocity, he knew about that of course but only worked it out for solids. Ignoring two critical components meant he didn't establish relations between them either.

That's my read.

Not to dismiss credits to Newton, who's is in another league than navier and stokes. In his own league even. He probably would have figured out what was only solved centuries later had he explored further, or had he benefited from perhaps just a few other later discoveries.

But that's dismissive of navier-stokes significant discoveries on fluid dynamics to not simply give them credit for the formula behind this simulation.

Oh, did you mean conservation?

What do you mean by considered bad practice? By whom? I would think this is one of the reasons that my Macs since 2008 have just worked without any HW problems.

That was soooo good!

Would love to see a wasm version of this!

Quite curious to hear: why?

Asking because this program isn't useful without 3G of model data, and WASM isn't useful outside of the browser (and perhaps some blockchain applications), where 3G of data isn't going to be practically available.

Yes, would love this on my iPhone. Reach out on andershaf@gmail.com if you want help on shipping in the Apple app store, I have a few apps there myself.