Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ino's commentslogin

I've installed mojave on that same computer model and the font smoothing switch is there, and the pixels look the same as before, which is great. Nothing has changed.

Maybe they only removed the switch on retina macs.


One thing I don't like is having a 30% chance to have to wait 2-4 seconds whenever I swipe to go to the previous page or click the back button.


This. This a thousand times. I get these random slow downs as well with safari. But only every once in a while. What is happening?


Ah so it’s not just me!


You can use goaccess to create a log every day to json, excluding IP while retaining stats for geolocation.

For this you can logrotate daily and run goaccess before rotation. I believe you can keep the server logs for a week for debugging while respecting GDPR.

For today's "realtime" data you can use goaccess on today's log on demand and use a cache.

You can write your custom stat viewers or use goaccess to view time range data from multiple json files.


Affinity Designer fits somewhere between PS and AI.

I find it better than both for doing web design and game graphics.


YouTube used to have an open feed for any search term, but they took it away. This seems to have search but I don't know if you need to authenticate first.


Because on iOS Safari any touch on the lower area reveals the autohidden bottom toolbar, so now the button has moved up, and now you have to click on it again for it to work.


You can do that by building it with only the modules you want: https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/README.md

There's also an official slim build without ajax and effect modules.


I remember reading google was doing the same experiment some 10 years ago.


I dispute that the difference in interest, if it exists, is biological. There are so many societal factors that come into play here from early age, and they all influence the outcome. It's an unfair world from the start.


Please note that I'm taking this position (or any other) myself. I'm merely trying to clarify what I think Damore's memo said. While I think it's entirely fair to say he's wrong, I think it's deeply unfair to mischaracterize what he wrote as so many have done.


how can you say that you dont think interest exists but if it does then its definitely not biological?


Supposing there's a 1955 Cadillac Series 62 Coupe in the middle of Antartica, which most likely there isn't, it didn't fall there from space.

I have no particular stakes on this discussion besides this one, I just dropped by to say this: I don't see any problem with the construction of that statement. At least as an informal or "folk" logic argument.


ok so the question still stands, you dont think theres a car in antartica, but if there is you know it didnt come from space

how do you know either things and why does the first mean the other is not possible?

also your example is using "from space" which is obviously fictional compared to "biological" which there is plenty of evidence for


I didn't say that. The "if it exists" I wrote came from "women may be biologically" from the parent. I'm disputing the statement that it's biological. The burden of proof is on whoever is making that claim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_education#H...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_education#C...


why else would you write "if it exists" if you already knew a difference existed? you would just say that you dont believe its biological in that case, so it seems like youre trying to go backwards and deny your own words here


This is how partisan ideology warps your mind.


There's a license for you, but it's nonfree:

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#JSON


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: