LLM's get relatively better at read-heavy operations (ex: code review) than write-heavy operations (ex: code generation) as codebases become less idiomatic.
I'm a cofounder at www.ellipsis.dev - we tried to build code generation for a LONG time before we realized that AI Code Review is way more doable with SOTA
Running neo4j on reasonable hardware (& depending on graph size), approximately 70% of the latency is calling OpenAI's embedding API. We've seen latency up to 750ms, for just the 3rd-party API call. :-/
As a result, we host embedding models on rented GPUs and get a P90 latency of 10ms.
> This website looks like it was designed by someone who just discovered the concept of "AI" and decided to slap it all over a half-baked template. Your color scheme is about as inspiring as a Windows '95 screensaver, and your layout feels like it was put together by a kindergartner with a crayon and a ruler. What's with the "trusted by 1,400+ GitHub users" badge? Do you expect anyone to be impressed by this grand endorsement from approximately 0.00001% of the developer community? Your idea of "AI code reviews" seems as lofty as a middle school science project titled "Let's Cure Cancer." You hail it like it's the second coming of sliced bread, but your execution and presentation scream amateur hour. And "7-day trial"? Can't wait to dedicate a whole week to something that looks like it was made on a GeoCities page. Fix your design, your messaging, and maybe try again when you actually understand the tech you're hawking.
yes i am, and i save the banner id to the user's browser so when they refresh they don't see a different banner.
No I don't know of any other offerings - but I am competing with website builders like squarespace and shopify that offer the banners for free, although not a/b tested
- Hunter @ Ellipsis