That would be implying that the prosecutor would prefer taking the life of an innocent rather than having it hurt his career, making the prosecutor kind of a criminal.
Jokes aside, prosecutors pushing through cases they know to be unsound isn't exactly uncommon. Many prosecutors are more concerned with their conviction rates than they are in justice, because that's what they are measured and rewarded by.
"Right" and "wrong" are dependent upon the system and how it rewards you.I would agree that most prosecutors what to serve justice for malfeasance that has been committed. That's different than whether a case is the "right" or "wrong" one to take.
If a case seems unclear, and you could spend years working on a conviction that will ultimately fall through, that hurts your ability to do justice for more readily winnable cases. You have to spend the time building a case, do all the paperwork, go to trial, etc. That's opportunity cost. So spending that on a case you have 10% chance of winning just isn't a good use of time. Add that to the fact that conviction rate is a metric used to quantify skill, you're rewarded for serving justice successfully. And that then dictates how much money you can get which can help fund enforcing justice.
I believe you're looking at the moral right/wrong, and I don't believe that is the same right/wrong being discussed in terms of how lawyers often choose cases. At the end of the day, lawyers need work and they get that mostly through word of mouth and reputation. You don't really get either of those when you lose cases.
You're version of the right thing and the prosecutors version might not align.
The right thing for them is to put as many criminals behind bars. They review cases and pick ones they can win. They will attack and find unrelated weak points in your character to win. They believe they are doing the right thing and will use whatever they can legally against you. You being innocent and going to court is means someone made a mistake. To confess to a mistake loses you credibility, to confess to an ongoing process mistake could open up other cases where dangerous people could be set free.
It is trial if wrong to convince one's self that accused are probably guilty and that actions that convict them are moral even the proof is insufficient or weak or the procedure flawed.
Most people want to do the right thing wherein right thing is almost entirely defined by norms and customs of their environment. If the norms and expectations are high ethical and correct standards people will follow them to the degree they are able.
To what degree are such standards broken or defective in America though?
Lest we forget the head lawyer of Texas a state home to aprox 27 million people or around 8% of the nation is a man whose own prosecution has for years only been stymied by the difficulty of prosecuting the man at the head of the states justice department. Either 8 or 9 (I've lost track) directly beneath him have resigned and accused him of corruption.
This isn't even an isolated instance corruption is found in fact all over the united states.
Even when in theory we would like to do the right thing we have a hard time establishing what standards are even real. Look at the fact. For proof of that look no further than the science of hair analysis which the FBI spent decades using to convict the accused before we realized that they were incapable of differentiating dog hair from human hair.
Think of entire people going in to work producing work product about imaginary science they were pretending to do competently and sending people to death row in part because of their fake work product.
The justice system in America is a bad joke that is primarily differentiated from say Cuba in that bribes are paid to your lawyer instead of directly to government officials.
Prosecutors are shaped by an environment that equates “the right thing” to “punishing the guilty.” It’s like any profession... a surgeon will think you need surgery and a prosecutor will think the guy in handcuffs needs to go to jail.
The prosecutor doesn't see it that way. They see it as just "knowing" the guy is "definitely guilty". It's just like, a feeling you know? And a win will look great when they go for re-election (why is that even a thing?).
Presuming rational actors in this case is missing the general problem with the system: people very easily convince themselves they know the truth despite how the validity of the evidence changes. Whatever it said initially, that must be right - it's misinformation 101. Once a belief is established it is much harder to change.
You already elect politicians. If that system is producing people you don't trust to manage the affairs of state, why would electing prosecutors lead to different results?
Hard to say, really. It's one of those compromises, quis custodiet and all that.
I very much agree with you: a government has a monopoly on violence and ultimately we all end up trusting it. Too many checks and balances lead to gridlock. Too few lead to oppression. Much of it ends up being decided on inertia. We do it both ways in different jurisdictions, with successes and failures in both.
That's not how prosecuters work in the US. Their goal is to win the case, not make the "right" decision. They'll spin evidence as hard as they can against the accused.
The prosecutor isn't unilaterally deciding whether the DNA evidence is valid. There will be a public hearing where both the prosecution and defense show evidence about the validity of the DNA evidence, and a court will rule based on that evidence.
You should read up on the rates of plea bargaining, as well as the methods prosecutors use to push defendants to do so, which include:
- Not revealing all information they are required to.
- Parallel construction (see above)
- Overcharging, with the goal of making the plea more palatable than the cost/risk of defending multiple absurd charges.
- Lying to you while getting to throw you in jail if you lie to them.
As a result, only 5% of federal cases go to trial.
None of behaviors these are rare. If your understanding of the legal system is based on popular culture, as most people’s is, it is basically law enforcement propaganda that has little relationship to reality.
Believe it or not, I was already aware of all of those things, having followed a number of criminal defense blogs.
If you read the article and appellate decision which is linked, it says what I just said:
>On Wednesday, the appellate court sided with the defense [PDF] and sent the case back to a lower court directing the judge to compel Cybergenetics to make the TrueAllele code available to the defense team.
Yeah, the system is in a pretty horrific state when you have to count on prosecutors' restraint for anything. Granted, we are in such a state, but it's beneficial not to just accept that as the status quo.
If you want a serious paid alternative, there is graphcomment.com, the design is very neat, the team is very responsive to their user base. It’s still a human sized company. (Disclaimer: have been working for that company in the past)
I tried codemirror and draftjs. Draftjs was actually much better than codemirror, the api for the former is so difficult to deal with, the latter was a bliss.
Indeed there was a confusion, it was ProseMirror. To be more specific about my use-case, I wanted to build a text editor for a forum which allows to embed images and videos directly in the editing zone, in between paragraphs of the text. It’s a rather advanced thing to do for a text editor, and the solution took me several hundred of line of code with draftjs, but it was quite easy to achieve because draftjs api is very solid. Initially with ProseMirror it was a lot of struggling, and couldn’t find a way to do it . I also tried Quilljs, but wasn’t satisfied with it either.
I had a similar experience starting out with ProseMirror; I wanted to make something similar to the editors in Dropbox Paper and Notion, and found an out-of-the-box rich text editor called tiptap built onto of it.
They already had nodes for images and embeds [1, 2] which made development easy (I would recommend checking out the source code; its about a hundred lines of code for each, and simple). But as I made more custom nodes, I learned pretty well the internals of tiptap and how it used ProseMirror. And over time, I've come to appreciate knowing its api.
So if there's any advice for people trying to get started with ProseMirror, I would say to look at libraries which built upon it as example code such as tiptap or the outline rich-markdown-editor [3].
OP should try out ProseMirror [1], which is the rich-text editor sibling of CodeMirror. And if you like ProseMirror's API, CodeMirror 6 is structured similar to it.
Pitch (from Berlin) is using Clojure as well as Reagent with React. From what I saw it's quite a moderately sized app (not a gigantic one, but not a side-project sized either, in between that's what I mean).
Reading Reddit comments will feels like hell if you’re right winging. You described it pretty well, it’s all about displaying a strong sense of moral, which at the end is translated into a false sense of superiority. « Look at me, I am a good person! »
I’m a senior frontend developer. On a short note about my work - I’m experienced on a great variety of frontend technologies - I've strong CSS & JS skills - I know what to do & understand priorities when working on a project - I’m proactive & productive. I’m available to work full-time starting now, and I have some availability for a call in case you have an interest starting a conversation.
---
Looking for a productive developer to boost your project?
*worse performance, because you drop more things that often happen before accessing db -> on the level of database - Simple as that its not going to spend 100% computing power on things you would expect it to..
So you get worse performance and harder to maintain code.
it's very hard to add or remove a rule compared to CSS where each rule is on it's own line.
Also some pretty significant issue for me was hot-reloading taking a lot of time, whereas in CSS you can just refresh linked stylesheet, with tailwind you need to reload complete page, and if your page is hosted on a Django/Symfony/RoR application in development mode, you better have to be patient at each CSS modification !
There is a project by the creators/maintainers of Tailwind called TailwindUI[1] that is paid. The pricing appears to start at $149 USD which may not be accessible for everyone.
I identify a lot with parent comment. Had a lot of chronic pain resulting in very intense and sharp pain near the nose, I really thought it was linked to sinus cavities being inflamed.
At the end it was very linked to my mental state, it took me half a decade to figure it. As parent comment is suggesting, slow breathing to remove tensions near your rib cage can help.
The most useful tool for me is to smoke cannabis, I then identify pain points in my body and massaging them with my hand vigorously is effective. Hope it can help people having « the same kind » of chronic pain.
Your almost describing TMJ. There is a spot between nose and ear that gets crazy tight for me. First time I Painfully massaged it out I had a 75% decrease in migraines.
