For now this is (relatively) easy since bindings for GoLang, Rust NodeJS/Deno, etc are available and the API is mostly the same in general.
---
The ideas that MDBX uses to solve these issues are simple: zero-cost micro-defragmentation, coalescing short GC/freelist records, chunking too long GC/freelist records, LIFO for GC/freelist reclaiming, etc.
Many of the ideas mentioned seems simple to implement in BoldDB. However the complete solution is not documented and too complicated (in accordance with the traditions inherited from LMDB ;)
So BoltDB and LMDB affected users may switch to libmdbx as the Erigon (Ethereum implementation) does year ago https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/wiki/Criteria-for-tran...
For now this is (relatively) easy since bindings for GoLang, Rust NodeJS/Deno, etc are available and the API is mostly the same in general.
---
The ideas that MDBX uses to solve these issues are simple: zero-cost micro-defragmentation, coalescing short GC/freelist records, chunking too long GC/freelist records, LIFO for GC/freelist reclaiming, etc.
Many of the ideas mentioned seems simple to implement in BoldDB. However the complete solution is not documented and too complicated (in accordance with the traditions inherited from LMDB ;)