hot take: this is how legislation should work

open comments, accepting pull requests, use AI tooling to weed out the ragebait and trolling for things that might actually be useful

The level-headedness of direct democracy meets the accountability of anonymous internet commenting!

One man’s “useful” is another man’s “trolling”

fair

Yet earnings estimates remain solid.

Great idea - M&A your way out of bad execution

"Act as if someone else smarter than you is going to look at your code" - best advice I've ever gotten

Feels like the author is having some sort of existential crisis.

It feels like a lot of people are having an existential crisis...

Seems like there are a lot of events missing

Getting the right number of events ie which events were significant enough to put on here with combat footage was a challenge as well. Particularly for the first day or two where a number of US bases and Iranian targets were hit. I think in particular I’ll try to add more manually for the first two days of the war. But other than those two days were there any specific events you think the AI missed? Sometimes I think it makes the fair decision to combine certain incidents. For example today 3 ships were hit in the strait of Hormuz but I don’t expect three different events for that and I think the right thing would be one event.

Ukraine seems like the obvious big miss.

Oh you mean the whole Ukraine war? Yes we removed that for now for quality reasons and currently we’re just covering the Iran war while we get the particulars right. After that we’ll add Ukraine, Myanmar, Sudan etc. We posted this here first to get input before populating the rest of the conflicts.

Only there would have never been an Enlightenment without Catholic rigor.

Granted, but fortunately things have improved since the middle ages.

This statement is based on a surface level (if that) understanding of Christianity. Machiavelli and Dostoevsky aside, whose criticisms are somewhat deeper but still misguided, there are many thinkers who question the existence of God but acknowledge the benefits of a God-centered society.

> God-centered society

Need not be Christian.

You're right.

But society where the basis has a liberal perspective, individual sovereignty is held in the highest regard, private property is protected, and the nuclear family is the underpinning of it, I'm okay with. Judeo-Christian societies have this, and maybe aside from Sikhs and some Buddhist sects I don't know of any other religion that does this.