Adobe added embedded javascript to pdfs. Its an option to turn it off but its enabled by default. I turned mine off a long time back and never notice any problems but I don't use a lot of pdfs with interactive forms.

This is cool. I did something similar at my work using smokeping and the #@vtext.com to send the texts.

https://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/

Thanks. It's simple but seems to be a common need. One of those tools many companies end up having to build but keep internal.

It does seem like they have destroyed most of the competition. I was frustrated with the ad-blocking the other day and looking for a video but the whole first page of links was all youtube. I guess that's why they are starting to crack down on adblockers since people don't have as many other places to go now.

I mean I don't know if I would say the land is just abandoned. Some farmland that people let go back to forest can also have the trees harvested from it periodically so its still productive in another way. The land can still be valuable.

I don't see the trees around here being planted in any systematic way. The forests look abandoned, with mostly commercially worthless trees growing.

It's kinda ironic to post that on a site that uses var in its javascript

I always though something like ublock origin should be built in with a standard format for the block list rules so people could just use different rules lists if they wanted to.

It would be nice to have a feature for enable/disable javascript per site also.

Believe it does. Also noscript exists.

NoScript is a relic of the past and redundant with uBlock Origin - https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-medium...

Not at all. I find noscript much easier to understand. I only use UBO for "set and forget" installations, as configuring it is a nightmare.

The NOAA has an api here:

https://www.weather.gov/documentation/services-web-api

It's free to use, but they have rate limits. I was always wanting to set up something like that too, but I never got around to it.

They don't mention any extra costs for people to manage the on premise setup. I mean its probably still a savings for them but it seems weird to leave that out.

It's because there aren't any additional people, the ones who managed the cloud resources now manage the on-prem resources:

> "We've been out for just over a year now, and the team managing everything is still the same. There were no hidden dragons of additional workloads associated with the exit that required us to balloon the team, as some spectators speculated when we announced it."

Here's an article with some pictures in case anyone else was curious about red sprites like I was.

https://earthsky.org/earth/definition-what-are-lightning-spr...

The wikipedia page actually has some incredible images as well, including several from space that show their scale and position in the atmosphere (high up)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprite_(lightning)

that shot with them aligned with Milky Way is spectacular

yeah, its pretty cool how most of these photos they were trying to take a picture of something else and the red sprites just happened to be in the right place because of a storm front moving in.