See also:

https://ipv6.fail/domain?filter=sinners

Tbh this site is pretty misleading. Fastly and Cloudflare support ipv6 pretty well in their productы, it’s just that their marketing team apparently don’t care

> Tbh this site is pretty misleading

The website is pretty explicit about that it's testing if a domain/website is available over IPv6 vs IPv4. Clicking on a website also sends you to https://ipv6.fail/domain/cloudflare.net/ where it's even more explicit what they're testing against. Wouldn't call it misleading exactly.

Monero bridges the two of these things together nicely.

Why is this a warning??

Can someone explains why explorer crashes when dragging files (unintentionally) over an offline mapped network drive?

I feel like this is a basic thing that should have come up in testing.

Network filesystems seem to be one of those things that's remarkably tricky to get right; my experience with that on Linux hasn't been much better, i.e. mounted drives that have become disconnected can cause anything from tens-of-minutes-long waits to forever hangs. I think it's a tension between giving up too easily (and thus you get errors in applications whenever the network is even slightly intermittent) and trying too hard to reconnect (permanent hangs, in the case of infinite retries.)

Right. You'd have to revoke the URL the QR code points too, not the QR code itself.