> The new models find real stuff. Forget the slop; will projects be able to keep up with a steady feed of verified, reproducible, reliably-exploitable sev:hi vulnerabilities?

If LLMs are as capable as said in the article, there will be an initial wave of security vulnerabilities. But then, all vulnerabilities will be discovered (or at least, LLMs will not find any more), and only new code will introduce new vulnerabilities. And everyone will be using LLMs to check the new code. So, regardless of what they say is correct or not, the problem doesn't really exist.

Indeed, the market shouldn't be, and is not, entirely free. We should strive for the right balance between freedom and regulation.

Interesting idea. But, in your vision, what would be the main difference between this approach and actually wiping your device, install just some basic apps you need during the travel (e.g. airline's app for the boarding pass and flight info) and then restore from your cloud backup at the end of the flight? Main difference I see is that Apple/Google wouldn't have access to your data, but this only makes sense if you're not using their services to start with.

So do you give to your doctor your landline's nuber, and this is why they're surprised, or you don't even have that?

You're an hacker, detained.

> nor create specialized SoCs with ML cores that obviate the need for lots and lots of RAM

Why do you say they can't do this?

For two

I reported the miscalssification, you can do it as well from the linked page.

Edit: reading some comments here seems that I was too fast, and that the story is much more complicated. Having just the Cloudflare page as a context, I assumed the news were a miscalssification. Could someone share more context on what is going on here?

> Comparing him to Nero is gross.

Just an historic curiosity: Nero setting Rome on fire is just a legend. At the time, there was a fire every other day due to wooden houses and poor to nonexistent safety. I even heard somewhere that Nero actively tried to help some people escaping from the fire by opening his residence's doors. So the comparison with Nero could still be correct, but for another reason: someone being wrongly blamed.

But, a Raspberry Pi isn't supposed to be a replacement for your desktop; it is meant as a device for experimentation.

The Raspberry Pi 500, essentially the Pi 5 inside a keyboard, is sold as a "refined personal computer". "A fast, powerful computer built into a high-quality keyboard, for the ultimate compact PC experience."

https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-500/

Then marketing struck again. Anyway, that isn't a device the average user would buy, so I'm not concerned about Ubuntu failing to upgrade on such a platform. I would take the complaint as valid if the issue existed on a consumer laptop, but this isn't the case.

Right. I'd like to see them do the Windows 11 upgrade on the same hardware...