I like your take on that. I also tend to think that it just diversifies market offers. Not everyone will want to vibecode their applications. Some people will still prefer to have someone create it for them.
I hate to see that these companies are just waltzing past the legal standards that should be put on them to scrutinize their data collection which could be found unconstitutional.
And I very much agree that US needs to tighten their privacy legislature.
I haven’t heard of them, but I love the heart behind the cause and that people seem to be passionate about it and the fact that it this is a community thing.
glaucon, I agree with you. Most of feeling of "gatekeepiness" came from being a novice at using tmux and having to get used to a new workflow. tmux is as gatekeepy as vim, or other complex cli tool is - if you have never used it in the past, you might find it to be a challenge. That was all I was trying to point out. It is an entry in a diary of a noob tmux user :D
I have thought about that. For this same reason I did not remap a lot of keys in nvim, because I still want to be able to use vim wherever I work if that is the only option.
However, I think that creating a simple git repository with rc files and configuration can be used to create a uniform experience across machines.
The git repo idea is fine for some machines, but when I log into a random customers server at 4:00AM to fix some issue that paged me, I'm not spending time cloning a repo to setup neither vim nor tmux, it just has to work.
Also the machine may not actually able to reach out onto the wider internet.
I think it depends on the use case. If I had to do what you do with random machines, I would probably need to be familiar with default tool setups as well