By “ethical attack simulations,” I mean simulations intended for defensive security testing, education, and controlled lab environments (e.g. local machines, intentionally vulnerable targets, or systems you own or have permission to test). Cyber+ itself doesn’t try to enforce morality in code; instead, it focuses on transparency and explicitness so it’s clear what an action does. Like most security tooling, ethical use depends on authorization, scope, and intent rather than the language alone. I’m open to improving the wording if “ethical attack simulations” feels misleading or too vague.
Try Cyber+ out. I will be very happy if you'll help by giving me some syntax ideas.
Fair point. By “ethical” I’m referring to the intended and documented usage — authorized testing, education, and defensive simulations. Like any security tool, it can be misused, but Cyber+ is designed and presented around consent-based scenarios rather than real-world exploitation
reply