What "semantics" game are you referring to? My original statement was a "semantics game", specifically an attack on the need for "aware" separate from "awake".
Your reply to that was that they are different, because one is obvious, and the other one isn't. I don't see how it justifies the other one's existence as a separate term, because it doesn't really say anything, so for clarity I asked a question that could clearly separate the two concepts, if that separation exists at all.
It is also supposed to be an easy question to answer: if you know the two "consciousness" definitions are different and how, which you imply is so obvious that me claiming otherwise is "disingenuous", it should not be too hard to provide an example where they are not the same for the same entity. Question yourself: can you actually think of any instances of such that are clear cut and can't be explained by mundane things like a person having false memories.
Your reply to that was that they are different, because one is obvious, and the other one isn't. I don't see how it justifies the other one's existence as a separate term, because it doesn't really say anything, so for clarity I asked a question that could clearly separate the two concepts, if that separation exists at all.
It is also supposed to be an easy question to answer: if you know the two "consciousness" definitions are different and how, which you imply is so obvious that me claiming otherwise is "disingenuous", it should not be too hard to provide an example where they are not the same for the same entity. Question yourself: can you actually think of any instances of such that are clear cut and can't be explained by mundane things like a person having false memories.