Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This article misses the point entirely.

It's true that most cattle farms are on the small-end, and have plenty of land for their cattle.

It's also true that the vast majority of cows slaughtered for meat come from just a few industrial feedlots.

Changing the way that "most" farms work might change how much methane truth A cows produce, but the vast majority of cows are truth B cows that aren't impacted by the decisions of small-time farmers.

There is not enough land on this earth to allow for free-range cattle at the rate humans consume them. The solution isn't to do it more efficiently, but to stop and do something else. Ford said people would ask for faster horses, and 100 years later we have people wanting cows that fart differently.

It's the cheeseburger you want, not another magic chemical added to the lovecraftian nightmare that is factory farming. The way to reduce the impact cows have on the environment is to reduce the number of cows bred for food.



One could also say people are asking for non-meat as a solution when maybe the answer is to make cow farts different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: